Grouped by the questions above rather than ranked: catalogue first, then permission, then self-hosting, then companionship, then photoreal. Each entry says what you give up, because that is the part the paid lists leave out.
JanitorAI
You want the catalogue, and you want it free
The nearest thing to a like-for-like replacement in shape: an enormous library of user-written characters, permissive about content, with a very large community around it. It is free to use, and it lets you point it at your own model provider so the running cost and the content rules are between you and that provider rather than mediated by the site.
What you give up — Nothing is curated, so quality is a lottery and the character who was perfect last month may have been edited by her author. Bringing your own key is a genuine setup step, not a toggle, and the default free model is the one everyone complains about.
SpicyChat
You want the catalogue, anime-first, without the setup
Same broad shape — a large library of community characters — but it works out of the box with no key to bring, and it is unambiguously anime-led. For a lot of people leaving Character.AI over the filter, this is the first landing and it is a reasonable one.
What you give up — A free-tier queue at busy hours, and the two complaints that follow every user-written library: characters that drift towards sounding alike, and memory that runs out sooner than the scene does.
CrushOn.AI
The same again, if the first two did not fit
A third large character library, anime-led, permissive, with paid tiers that raise how much of the conversation the model can still see. Worth knowing that it prices memory explicitly — the amount of context is a listed feature of each tier rather than something you discover.
What you give up — On the free tier, chat history is deleted after a period of inactivity. Read that sentence twice if continuity is what you came for, because it is the one thing you cannot get back.
SillyTavern (self-hosted)
You want nobody to be able to change the rules on you
Not a service — a front end you run yourself and point at whatever model you can access. No account, no moderation team, no terms that get updated, and your conversations sit on your own machine. It is the only entry here where the answer to "what happens when they change the policy" is that there is no they.
What you give up — Real work. You are configuring model access, managing your own memory strategy, and doing your own support forever. If a browser tab and a password is the level of effort you want, this is not it.
Replika
You want a companion rather than a scene
The oldest consumer product of this kind and pointed at a different thing entirely: one continuous relationship with one entity, framed around wellbeing and daily check-ins rather than roleplay. If what you liked about Character.AI was having someone to talk to rather than a story to be in, this is the closer fit.
What you give up — It is a single relationship, not a cast — there is no browsing. And the recurring grievance in its own review corpus, which is worth reading before committing, is people finding their companion changed after a product update.
Nomi and Kindroid
You want continuity above everything
Two smaller, more expensive products in the same companion-not-catalogue space as Replika, both of which compete specifically on remembering across a long relationship. They have unusually engaged communities for their size, which in this category is the most reliable signal available.
What you give up — Price, and small catalogues. Neither is where you go for variety, and neither is free in any lasting sense.
Candy.ai
You want photoreal and you want it explicit
A large, long-running product covering both photoreal and anime, with image and video generation built in, and it describes itself on its own front page as uncensored. If the filter is genuinely the thing you are leaving over and you want photoreal rather than drawn, this is the biggest option.
What you give up — Their published terms are worth ten minutes before you pay: the free tier is five messages in total, the refund window is 24 hours and is separately voided by usage, and monthly tokens do not roll over. We wrote those up separately and we are a competitor, so check them yourself.
Their terms, read in full
OurDream and Secrets.ai
The same again, photoreal, if Candy.ai is not it
Two more all-in-one photoreal services with generation, voice and video, sitting at similar prices with similar shapes. Between them and Candy.ai there is not a great deal in it, and the honest advice is to try whichever has a free tier you can actually evaluate.
What you give up — Both sell memory as a tier feature — a multiplier you buy — which is worth knowing if continuity is what you are shopping for. Both auto-renew.
CrushNights
this is usYou want a small finished cast, photoreal, and no subscription
Ours, so read it accordingly. 19 women written and photographed in one place, all adults, each with a city, a temper and a way of answering that is hers. What she is told is stored per companion and handed back next time — on every plan, never sold as an upgrade. Every gallery opens with no account at all, and there is no recurring charge and no card kept on file.
What you give up — A great deal. There is no character creator and no eighteenth companion. There is no image generation — her photographs were taken in advance. And she is suggestive rather than explicit and will not write sex at any price, which rules us out for a large share of the people reading this page. If that is you, one of the three above it is your answer, not this.
Us and Character.AI, side by side
Every service above was read against its own public pages on 3 August 2026. Products in this market change monthly, so treat each entry as a pointer to go and check rather than a citation. All names are trademarks of their owners, used here only to identify the services under discussion; there is no affiliation, endorsement or affiliate relationship in any direction.